2023/06/24 | 便利屋Reレンジャー | 未分類
An agreement in restraint of marriage is a legal contract that limits the freedom of two individuals to marry each other. It is considered a valid contract in certain circumstances, as outlined under the Indian Contract Act. In this article, we will discuss the persons for whom an agreement in restraint of marriage is considered valid.
Firstly, an agreement in restraint of marriage is valid when it is made between parties who are not prohibited from marrying each other under the law. For instance, if two individuals from different castes or religions agree to marry each other, an agreement in restraint of marriage between them would be considered valid.
Secondly, an agreement in restraint of marriage is considered valid if it is made in the context of a business or professional relationship. For instance, a company may require its employees to sign an agreement not to marry competitors during their time with the company. Such an agreement is valid as it serves a legitimate business purpose.
Thirdly, an agreement in restraint of marriage is valid when it is made to protect the interests of the parties involved. For example, a couple may sign an agreement not to marry other individuals during the time they are in a committed relationship. This agreement would be considered valid as it serves to protect their mutual interests.
Fourthly, an agreement in restraint of marriage is valid when it is made to avoid a dispute or settle a dispute between the parties involved. For instance, if two individuals are in a dispute over a property and one of them agrees not to marry the other as part of the settlement, such an agreement would be valid.
In conclusion, an agreement in restraint of marriage is considered valid in certain circumstances. It is important to note that such an agreement must serve a legitimate purpose and cannot be against public policy. It is always advisable to seek legal advice before entering into any contractual agreement.